This Sounds Reassuring
The Community's BFF Pincus has been told that since the UAE has been so helpful in the "war on terror", that they are now part of the club.
Reviews by U.S. intelligence agencies supported Dubai Ports World's purchase of the British company running terminals at six American seaports, and the assessments were made available to the Treasury Department-run interagency committee that approved the deal, according to senior administration officials.
The intelligence studies were coordinated by the Intelligence Community Acquisition Risk Center, a new organization under the office of the Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte, said one official. The center normally does broad threat analyses of foreign commercial entities that seek to do business with U.S. intelligence agencies.
Pincus is saying that a small office that does cursory checks of IC databases on the backgrounds of foreign companies gives the plan the thumbs up.
While contents of the intelligence assessments remain classified, current and former intelligence officials yesterday spoke highly of the level of counterterrorism cooperation provided after Sept. 11, 2001, by Dubai and several of the other states that make up the United Arab Emirates.
A former senior CIA official recalled that, although money transfers from Dubai were used by the Sept. 11 hijackers, Dubai's security services "were one of the best in the UAE to work with" after the attacks. He said that once the agency moved against Pakistani nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan and his black-market sales of nuclear technology, "they helped facilitate the CIA's penetration of Khan's network."
What are the odds that the UAE will be glad to see that revelation in a major newspaper, even if untrue? (Which is likely.)
Dubai also assisted in the capture of al-Qaeda terrorists.
Nice one. The proof:
An al-Qaeda statement released in Arabic in spring 2002 refers to UAE officials as wanting to "appease the Americans' wishes" including detaining "a number of Mujahideen," according to captured documents made available last week by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. The al-Qaeda statement threatened the UAE, saying that "you are an easier target than them; your homeland is exposed to us."
Anyone with a passing familiarity with al-Qaeda statements knows that most, if not all, of the Middle-Eastern nations collaborating with the U.S. in the "war on terror" have received the same type of boilerplate threats.
One intelligence official pointed out that when the U.S. Navy no longer made regular use of Yemen after the USS Cole was attacked in 2000, it moved its port calls for supplies and repairs to Dubai.
Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on Tuesday praised the "superb" military-to-military relationship with the UAE, saying, "In everything that we have asked and work with them on, they have proven to be very, very solid partners."
This just tells us that if you play ball with the U.S. security regime, you will receive a payoff.
If Hugo Chavez entered the bidding for the British port management company P&O, beating out Dubai to buy the port operations, there is no way that he--with no ties to Muslim terrorists at all--would be the approved buyer.
The real issue anyway is the continued health of the U.S. dollar.
If the Arabs, who hold a huge portion of U.S. debt, get the idea that their dollar holdings don't have the buying power of everybody else's--they will unload their U.S. bonds--spelling doom for the dollar.
5 Comments:
They're scrambling to save a backroom deal nobody is talking about. Pisser ain't it when the mob with a vote takes one's diversionary scare tactics seriously and start believing in the Arab boogey man - and demand you do so too.
I'm popping popcorn and watching how these duplicitous fuckers try to word their way out of this one and stay in the big oil money this is all about - again. Hope they choke trying to have their cake and eat it too.
But they never do, do they?
M1:
I'm still leaning toward the attempt to save the dollar.
But there are all sorts of plausible theories out there.
Among the most salacious are:
The Drug Smuggling Angle
and
The idea that Bush is planning to allow another 9-11 (but worse), then being able to blame the Arab port managers for letting the nukes in.
Save the dollar?...u think UAE would stop pegging their petro to it withouts our ports and petting?
I'm more inclined to believe that oil is pegged to the currency floated by the fist with the most flexible nuke delivery/response capacity and that this in turn keeps petro traded in greenbacks...no matter what various debt ratios are.
Credibly perceived insurmountable delivery of stand-off violence keeps oil pegged to dollars...not ad hoc sweet deals per se. If Iraq was to be dealt with then it should have been done stand-offish. That option remains and thus they can't do shit when it comes to re-pegging no matter how many underpriveleged Americans get wasted in the present hands-on debacle.
Now of Al Qaeda...I don't think those dip shits can do deep & staminous dick to our serious stateside infrastructure (or global for that matter) without our intelligence rogues giving them extended warranty lube jobs. Al Qaeda in the Balkans would've been little more than shivering chain smokers without our support -but with it they were awesome enuff.
I dunno..Al Qaeda can do ad hoc crap here `n there but nothing justifying the use of the word 'war' against them if we're not seditiously propping `em up. I mean, man... we're still running some of èm to fuck with the Ruskies in their backyard - again.
Given that the UAE is a shitty sandhole populated with dubious transacters, evil peddlers and 3rd world slave labor...it still isn't a threat to our deep interests...in fact it remains a convenient facilitator for 'us' by my skewed accounting.
But reconciling that with the scare mongering of the official version of the world's machinations...well that's another
meatball.
M1:
Re the dollar, I was thinking that if the Arab world thought that their dollars aren't worth shit in the real world, that they might start dumping them en masse.
That would be no bueno. Maybe if one of the brighter lights in the Community had spelled it out that way to Bush and Cheney, that could have explained the odd posturing political-wise of the administration on this issue.
Since my comment here, I read your take on the matter at SMC.
Yours looks like the real explanation.
M1:
Now you are being unnecessarily modest.
Your expertise is showing.
Although someone will have to get stuck with the "hot potato" dollar, and it probably won't be those old carpet merchants.
Post a Comment
<< Home