Monday, March 13, 2006

U.S. Campaign Against Iran Gets Media Attention

The American government machinations against Iran, which we have been discussing here since late last year, are beginning to be portrayed in the mainstream media as a coordinated program aiming to overthrow the Iranian regime.

Of course, the reports leave out the existence of the anti-Muslim information operation, a covert action by the CIA, that is helping to prepare world opinion for the punitive steps that will be needed to deal with the freedom hatin' Iranians.

As the dispute over its nuclear program arrives at the U.N. Security Council today, Iran has vaulted to the front of the U.S. national security agenda amid Bush administration plans for a sustained campaign against the ayatollahs of Tehran.

President Bush and his team have been huddling in closed-door meetings on Iran, summoning scholars for advice, investing in opposition activities, creating an Iran office in Washington and opening listening posts abroad dedicated to the efforts against Tehran.

The internal administration debate that raged in the first term between those who advocated more engagement with Iran and those who preferred more confrontation appears in the second term to be largely settled in favor of the latter...

In the past week, the State Department created an Iran desk. Last year, only two people in the department worked full time on Iran; now there will be 10. The department is launching more training in the Farsi language and is planning an Iranian career track, which has been difficult without an embassy there.

Undersecretary of State R. Nicholas Burns said in an interview that the department will also add staff in Dubai, which is part of the United Arab Emirates, as well as at other embassies in the vicinity of Iran, all assigned to watch Tehran. He called the new Dubai outpost the "21st century equivalent" of the Riga station in Latvia that monitored the Soviet Union in the 1930s when the United States had no embassy in Moscow.

The administration also has launched a $75 million program to advance democracy in Iran by expanding broadcasting into the country, funding nongovernmental organizations and promoting cultural exchanges. Voice of America broadcasts one hour a day into Iran; by April, that will grow to four hours a day, and the administration plans to go to 24 hours a day...

Now that the nuclear issue is at the Security Council, the U.S. strategy is to escalate gradually rather than force an immediate climax. The first step would be a statement by the council president declaring Iran in violation of nuclear treaty obligations and demanding it suspend uranium enrichment. If that fails, the council could be asked to impose economic sanctions or pass a resolution allowing military force to enforce compliance. Russia and China, which have veto power, seem unlikely to support either move...

Many military specialists doubt a strike would be effective because Iran's nuclear facilities are scattered in dozens of locations, and would require hundreds of sorties first to disrupt Iranian air defenses. Such an attack, they say, could inflame the Muslim world and alienate reformers within Iran...

Some Republicans, though, say a military attack may be required if only to set back Iran's nuclear program a few years.

These unnamed Republicans must have oil company connections.

That would be the only sane excuse for trumpeting a military solution that would result in oil prices reaching stratospheric levels, at least for an uncomfortable enough period of time to create negative economic conditions for everyone except the petroleum interests.

The disconnect between the administration and the rest of the civilized world on this issue (and others) is illustrated by a brief rude awakening experienced by our distinguished chief diplomat:

During her first trip to Europe as secretary of state, in February 2005, Rice was surprised that most questions from European officials concerned Iran, not Iraq, and was sobered by the realization that they viewed Washington as the problem, not Tehran.

I have been assured that her momentary discomfort has long been forgotten.

2 Comments:

Blogger M1 said...

Oh Effwit, once again you prove how one can continually count on you and your crew to hold down the fort. That's why we gotta have our daily Effwit.

3/13/2006 12:05 PM  
Blogger Effwit said...

M1:

Mange Takk.

Though I can imagine that they may not be too happy with this post over at the Death Star.

3/13/2006 12:25 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home