Permanent Bases, Democracy Assistance in Iraq Questioned
Maybe we should have made that decision before spending billions of dollars constructing permanent bases in areas formerly occupied by desert.
"The presence in Iraq is for a very clear purpose, and that's to enable Iraqis to be able to govern themselves and to create security forces that can help them do that," Rice told the House Appropriations Committee's foreign operations panel.
"I don't think that anybody believes that we really want to be there longer than we have to," the chief U.S. diplomat added.
However, Rice did not say when all U.S. forces would return home and did not directly answer Rep. Steven Rothman, D-N.J., when he asked, "Will the bases be permanent or not?"
"I would think that people would tell you, we're not seeking permanent bases really pretty much anywhere in the world these days. We are, in fact, in the process of removing base structure from a lot of places," Rice replied.
"I can't foresee the future of whether or not there will be some need for American forces for some period of time," she added. "But I can tell you that our discussions with the Iraqis are about getting them capable to defend, not just against their internal insurgency and internal enemies, but also to be able to be a responsible and defensible state within the region."
Some organizations face funding cutoffs this month, while others struggle to stretch resources through the summer. The shortfall threatens projects that teach Iraqis how to create and sustain political parties, think tanks, human rights groups, independent media outlets, trade unions and other elements of democratic society.
The shift in funding priorities comes as security costs are eating up an enormous share of U.S. funds for Iraq and the administration has already ratcheted back ambitions for reconstructing the country's battered infrastructure. While acknowledging that they are investing less in party-building and other such activities, administration officials argue that bringing more order and helping Iraqis run effective ministries contribute to democracy as well...
"The commitment to what the president of the United States will say every single day of the week is his number one priority in Iraq, when it's translated into action, looks very tiny," said Les Campbell, who runs programs in the Middle East for the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, known as NDI.
NDI and its sister, the International Republican Institute (IRI), will see their grants from the U.S. Agency for International Development dry up at the end of this month, according to a government document, leaving them only special funds earmarked by Congress last year. Similarly, the U.S. Institute of Peace has had its funding for Iraq democracy promotion cut by 60 percent. And the National Endowment for Democracy expects to run out of money for Iraqi programs by September...
IRI and NDI, which are affiliated with the two U.S. political parties, will lose USAID financing April 30. The two party institutes led a coalition to educate Iraqis before last year's elections. An evaluation commissioned by USAID in December called it "essential" that the program "be continued for at least another 24 months."
NDI and IRI would be a menace to Iraq if they were engaged in trying to bring U.S.-style "democracy" to the forlorn Iraqis. Fortunately, that was never the objective of their mission.
The party institutes will be able to continue some programs for now only because of a special earmark inserted into legislation last year with $56 million for the two groups. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) sponsored the earmark with support from Sens. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) after it appeared that NDI and IRI would run out of money last year...
Among the projects facing closure is the Iraq Civil Society and Media Program, funded by USAID and run by America's Development Foundation and the International Research & Exchanges Board. The program has established four civil society resource centers around the country, conducted hundreds of workshops and forums, and trained thousands of government officials in transparency and accountability. It also helped Iraqis set up the National Iraqi News Agency, the first independent news agency in the Arab world.
No word on whether the money flow to these groups from other government agencies will be effected.
2 Comments:
Oh it's all about permanent bases to be sure. If she ain't technically lying then it's cuz she's splitting semantic hairs. We are to colonize Iraq and Iran all the way through to Afghanistan with our monster bases from which we can project influence into the chasotic badlands they are immersed in.
Those countries may never settle down and instead remain in steady state flux - but that doesn't matter. In fact that is manageable from a certain petroperspective...more so at least than if the countries settle down with a regime not aligned to certain petrointerests. Steady state Chaos works well as a control grid too.
And btw,NED, USAID, NDI, IRI, CIPE,American Center for International Labor Solidarity....now there's an angle in itself from which to run a dozen posts or so.
M1:
We definately intend to have permanent bases. Just like we planned to have in Vietnam.
Your insight about a certain cultivated chaos in quite cogent. Steady state chaos good nomenclature--strong one, M1. As you say, that approach works as a system of control. To a certain point. If the Shiites turn on the occupation in a violent manner, that would result in uncontrollable chaos.
It would also complicate (or maybe accelerate) any planned chaos program for Iran.
And btw,NED, USAID, NDI, IRI, CIPE,American Center for International Labor Solidarity....now there's an angle in itself from which to run a dozen posts or so.
On the posts. Waaay too spooky. (Ukraine, etc.) But that is specifically why I ended this post with a provocative-ish sentence. ;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home