Thursday, January 19, 2006

Feds Seek Google Search Records

In an obscene case of government overreaching, the feds have issued a subpoena to Google for a wide range of company records, according to the San Jose Mercury News.

To it's credit the online search giant is refusing to comply with the Justice Department order:

In court papers filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose, Justice Department lawyers revealed that Google has refused to comply with a subpoena issued last year for the records, which include a request for 1 million random Web addresses and records of all Google searches from any one-week period.

A million random fucking web addresses?

And records of all Google searches for a one-week period?

This would mean a whole lot of people who had nothing to do with online pornography (the ostensible reason for the subpoena) would be snared in the government net.

The Mountain View-based search and advertising giant opposes releasing the information on a variety of grounds, saying it would violate the privacy rights of its users and reveal company trade secrets, according to court documents.

Nicole Wong, an associate general counsel for Google, said the company will fight the government's effort "vigorously.''...

The case worries privacy advocates, given the vast amount of information Google and other search engines know about their users.

"This is exactly the kind of case that privacy advocates have long feared,'' said Ray Everett-Church, a South Bay privacy consultant. "The idea that these massive databases are being thrown open to anyone with a court document is the worst-case scenario. If they lose this fight, consumers will think twice about letting Google deep into their lives.''

Everett-Church, who has consulted with Internet companies facing subpoenas, said Google could argue that releasing the information causes undue harm to its users' privacy.

"The government can't even claim that it's for national security,'' Everett-Church said. "They're just using it to get the search engines to do their research for them in a way that compromises the civil liberties of other people.''

This is a god damn outrage.

Other search engine owning companies haven't shown the balls of Google:

The government indicated that other, unspecified search engines have agreed to release the information, but not Google.

Those other companies are showing an all too typical American ass-kissing deference to authority these days.

Update: The Washington Post identifies the three other companies who at least partially complied with the overreaching demand for user data.

They are: AOL, Microsoft, and Yahoo.

6 Comments:

Blogger DrewL said...

I agree wholeheartedly. Kudos to Google for standing up to "the man", if you will. First the government got telecom companies to comply with an apparently massive data mining excursion into Americans' telephone records. Now they're trying to so the same with Internet search records. Where will it end?

This is precisely why we cannot allow the government, at its own discretion, to pry into and spy on Americans' private business. It goes against everything we're supposed to stand for. Quite plainly, it's wrong!

Let's hope Google stands its ground. Thanks goodness SOMEONE is willing to stand up to these veritable jack-booted thugs.

1/19/2006 11:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why such a large sample? Why every engine?

Why database instead of end user results?

Government must be up to something else. I can't believe MSN and Yahoo comply with this nonsense. Such action could lead to McCarthyism.

1/20/2006 12:49 AM  
Blogger Effwit said...

Drew L:

It is pretty egregious.

I am actually surprised that Google is standing up. I had heard that Brin and Page were conservatives.

It must be in order to protect their "secret algorithms", not out of the desire to protect civil rights.

1/20/2006 10:39 AM  
Blogger Effwit said...

Anon:

I agree that this cannot be solely about porn.

It is their spying fetish come to fore.

This morning's WaPo identifies the other companies who went along, at least partially, with the government's demands.

AOL, Microsoft and Yahoo.

1/20/2006 10:43 AM  
Blogger DrewL said...

I see that Google's share price took it on the chin today. Lost something like $39 or about 8% of its market value.

The Man will get his revenge one way or the other. Never disappoint The Man.

1/21/2006 1:00 AM  
Blogger Effwit said...

Drew L:

The blip in Google's stock price was more likely due to Henry Blodgett's prediction that Google will be trading soon at $100.

Your premise about not offending the man is correct nevertheless.

1/21/2006 10:14 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home