Friday, March 17, 2006

Iran Agrees To Diplomatic Talks

The Islamic Republic of Iran is attempting to try to defuse the tensions between their country and the United States by agreeing to official meetings which have been rare since the 1979 hostage crisis.

The White House welcomed the Iranian participation, which was solicited by the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad, Zalmay Khalilzad, and urged by Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, a Shiite leader in Iraq with close ties to Tehran.

Stephen J. Hadley, President Bush's national security adviser, said Khalilzad had been authorized to talk to the Iranians about their interference in Iraq "and make that concern known, recognizing that in the end of the day, it is not a negotiation." Hadley added that Iranian activity in Iraq "is giving comfort and, in some case, equipment to terrorists that are killing Iraqis and killing coalition forces. And that is what we have made very clear is unacceptable."

I have been searching the text of the Iranian acceptance of the diplomatic talks, yet I fail to see the part where Iran used the words "Iran's interference in Iraq." More likely from the Iranians point of view is that negotiations discussions will center on the "U.S. interference in Iraq."

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last year authorized Khalilzad to hold direct talks with Iran about Iraq, but the Iranians wanted to include other issues in the discussions, a senior State Department official said...

Iranian and U.S. diplomats have coordinated on regional conflicts in recent years. Tehran sent representatives to Germany for a conference that the United States convened to plan for Afghanistan's transition following the 2001 U.S.-led invasion. Iranian diplomats continued to meet with U.S. officials in Geneva and Paris in the run-up to the Iraq war, albeit secretly after Bush included Iran in the "axis of evil" he described in his January 2002 State of the Union address.

The governments exchanged information on hundreds of Arab fighters who fled Afghanistan into Iran, including a handful of senior al-Qaeda officials whom Iran offered to exchange for Iranian guerrillas in U.S. custody in Iraq. The guerrillas had tried to overthrow the Iranian government.

Bush eventually rejected the offer, a decision that infuriated the Iranians and marred the secret talks.

The Bush administration has authorized an information operation aimed at Iran using CIA and military psychological warfare officers.

In addition, the Bush administration this month announced a $75 million initiative to advance democracy in Iran by expanding broadcasting into the country, funding nongovernmental organizations and promoting cultural exchanges.

The cultural exchange is intended to help spread American values.

The first emissaries are rumored to be the Pussycat Dolls opening for Toby Keith. Some Stock Car racers will be on hand to sign autographs and pass out samples from their corporate sponsors.

That tour will be followed up by Britney Spears, and her opening act, Lindsay Lohan.

13 Comments:

Blogger M1 said...

The Iranians have made several previous attempts in recent months to negotiate their way out of the inevitable but being as the inevitable is...well, inevitable - the US Admin has accordingly turned them all down to preserve potent pretext. These overtures haven't been picked up by Western major media as far as I've tried to notice.

I'm assuming the US will wiggle its way out of any future reconciliation moves tabled by the soon-to-be-royally-fucked Persians.

It's just fun to watch how the wiggling will be done.

3/17/2006 12:12 PM  
Blogger vcthree said...

The first emissaries are rumored to be the Pussycat Dolls opening for Toby Keith. Some [NASCAR] racers will be on hand to sign autographs and pass out samples from their corporate sponsors.

That tour will be followed up by Britney Spears, and her opening act, Lindsay Lohan.


After which, of course, Iran will hate us forever.

Not to make fun of them, because I think they're good folks, and better pitchmen, but the NASCAR drivers would drive me insane, what with thier, "Well, I'd just like to thank my sponsors of the Motorola Ford crew for gettin' us over here today--Goodyear, Sunoco, Coca-Cola--but most of all, thank the Armed Forces. The M-16 handled real good up there today--bit of a rough landin' there, but it was real fast. And the #26 team enjoyed the ride, too."

I wonder if they get bonuses for each sponsor they get in on their 30 seconds of interview time

3/17/2006 12:53 PM  
Blogger vcthree said...

M-16? I mean't F. Damn it.

3/17/2006 12:56 PM  
Blogger Effwit said...

M1:

I'm sure that you are right about the prior Iranian offers to negotiate.

The press over here didn't cover it because we are supposed to be the good guys.

The U.S. will slither out of any detente efforts that are made. And then blame the freedom hatin' Muslims.

Kinda like how Bush is now saying that Saddam had his chance to re-admit the U.N. weapons inspectors, but didn't.

Bush thinks that no one will remember that Saddam did re-admit the U.N. inspectors, very inconveniently, because Bush had to then order them out to commence the bombing.

3/17/2006 1:33 PM  
Blogger Effwit said...

vcthree:

The choice of entertainment was made specifically to showcase American culture while simultaneously irritating Muslim sensitivities.

They were the best examples that I could come up with for my weak attempt at satire.

Your scenario about what it would look like is spot on.

3/17/2006 1:42 PM  
Blogger M1 said...

I'll try 'n dig up some links to salvage what little credibility my pirated bimbos have left me with.

3/17/2006 7:21 PM  
Blogger M1 said...

there we go:

http://www.atimes.com
/atimes/Middle_East
/HB07Ak01.html

3/17/2006 7:48 PM  
Blogger Effwit said...

M1:

Good find, much as we had expected, viz:

As a result, the stage is now set for Iran's victimization by a concerted Western campaign instrumentalizing the Security Council in the name of world peace and non-proliferation, taking full advantage of certain statements by Iran's president and thus deliberately conflating Iran's legal rights with their self-justified political objectives.

Kinda spooky, dont ya think.

BTW, old Graham Allison makes a good point there about Japan's likely reaction if South Korea gets a nuke. You know how everyone is saying publicly (including CIA) that North Korea has 2 to 8 nukes. I was told by a very knowledgeable source that in fact NK has zippo. And to watch China and Japan to act somewhat differently than they are currently when the North actually gets a working bomb.

Thanks for the link.

3/17/2006 8:07 PM  
Blogger DrewL said...

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush's top foreign policy adviser said Friday that Iran's new willingness to talk about Iraq with the United States is probably a ploy designed to "divert pressure and divert attention" from international concern that Tehran wants a nuclear bomb.
*********************************
Of course, the advisor in question is Stephen Hadley...the tool.

A ploy? Hmmmmm. Methinks the Bushies know all about "ploys".

3/17/2006 10:07 PM  
Blogger Effwit said...

DrewL:

Hadley, as I'm sure you know, is a textbook example of The Peter's Principle: In an organization, each person rises to the level of his own incompetence.

"Divert attention?"

ROFL

Kinda like "Operation Swarmer."

3/17/2006 10:27 PM  
Blogger M1 said...

Oh, and btw...I think the Iraqis know full well how to build IEDs on their own given their recent history. As well, I'm sure the Iraqis have all the caches of guerilla warfare tools they need in abundance from earlier circumstances.

That the Iranian resources would be tipping any scales in Iraq is beyond absurd. Look at the U.S....we have firepower galore and we can't keep anything but the green zone. Scales are tipped by hearts and minds, not Iranian AK-47s or a few jihadist imports.

Again, these fuckers administered the Iraq campaign as badly as their wives chose husbands.

Crazies all of 'em, I tell'ya. Crazies!
M1

3/18/2006 10:03 AM  
Blogger M1 said...

That's the funniest thang I've heard all month. nukes & ied's...ya crack a meatball up

3/18/2006 2:55 PM  
Blogger Effwit said...

M1:

Your bit about the wives' lack of discernment in choosing a mate is way high on my list.

3/18/2006 3:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home